Like many developers I am also in search of a perfect development environment!
I understand this might not be true for everyone. If you are a .Net developer who has a good laptop loaded with the latest Windows then I assume you already have a perfect development environment. But if you are a Java/Python developer writing code destined to a Linux server, stuck with a Windows laptop then there is a problem.
Many corporate environments are tied to Microsoft technologies for Office, chat, email, VPN, Windows, etc.
I mainly write Java, Haskell and Python these days. As a Linux guy I obviously don’t like to work on Windows but at work we are forced to use Windows 7 and BYOD or booting any other OS is not allowed.
Although my laptop has an i7 CPU with 32 GB of ram but still it’s a Windows!
No offence to MS fans but it doesn’t make any sense to develop and test on one platform and deploy to another.
We have had many instances where things behaved differently on different OSes and wasted hours to troubleshoot. But this is very hard to explain to some managers and IT people! A minimum development machine for someone like me must be a Mac or a Linux.
In absence of any other choice I decided to run Linux on a VM so installed Fedora on Virtualbox and gave it 160 GB disk, 24 GB ram and 2 monitors. It is working like a charm and I am really happy about the setup. I have loaded all my development tools such as IDE, Docker, etc. into the VM and use Window host for VPN, some email checking and Office document editing only when difficult in the VM.
So far this is working really good although I had few issues initially with setting up the networking right but at the end I have a polished development environment and I can use a real bash natively (Not a Window 10 cheat bash!)
Being a VM with UI there is definitely a bit of lag but haven’t been a serious issue so far. I would suggest Xfce in order to have a smoother experience rather than default Gnome.
Microservices or Micro Service Architecture (MSA) is being advertised heavily these days mostly by Thoughtworks.
At first it looks like a great idea, in fact it is a great idea if you look at this this way:
There are boundaries between services.
Each service is small enough to understand, to be re-written, etc.
Each service is supposed to do only one thing.
Each service can be so fine grained that it can even correspond to a single database table (extreme?)
I would like to call it a “pattern” as it has its own pro’s and con’s. But none of these are new concepts or best practices on their own. To me MSA at its core seems like a style (or part) of SOA since services are the “things” you work with.
On the other hand there are few areas where the current articles and enthusiasts are not very clear about:
How do we orchestrate a ton of services? In all videos and articles they diminish ESBs. I am not a fan of ESBs but they do a fine job of orchestration but MSA is not clear about it. I have seen suggestions on using a thin layer of orchestration, using messaging or RESTful styles, etc but if you have a million of microservice then it would be a nightmare.
If we create too restricted boundaries around our services and they become so isolated then how do they communicate from a database perspective? How sales database can be so separate from ordering database?
Lots of small services makes transaction management a big job.
Given these concerns you have to be very careful when you use MSA. I feel this is an old concept with a new name which is not yet mature to become a full fledged style of architecture. Probably it is good in smaller applications with mostly read-only services or services which are inherently separable….Time will tell…
If you have little ones around you know they love to play with tablets. Our 14 months boy Kian is used to watching Baby Einstein series on my Nexus 7 while having a meal on his high chair. After the meal he sometimes takes the tablet and keeps watching on the floor. The other day he put the tablet on a chair but it dropped face down on the stone surface. Although the distance was less than 50 cm and it has a chunky cover on but I was shocked that the screen just trashed.
On ebay some there are separate screens and digitizer but I suggest buying both together. It is around AUD 60. This video tells how to open it up. To remove the cracked screen from the bezel I just put it under the sun for about an hour. The video is not very clear on how to attach the new screen to the bezel. For that I used Loctite Super Glue for Glass. It all went very smooth and I have a brand new Nexus again. I suggest affixing a screen protector as well…
In our office we cannot create Outlook rules to forward emails outside the corporate network (say to Gmail) automatically but you can write a VB script/Macro to do that. Although I have never done that as it might be illegal but this just explains that it is feasible!
The script basically is called whenever Outlook received a new email:
private Sub Application_NewMail()
Dim newMail As MailItem
Dim s As String
Dim b As String
Set newMail = Application.GetNamespace("MAPI").GetDefaultFolder(olFolderInbox).Items.GetLast
s = CStr(newMail.SenderName + ": " + newMail.subject)
b = CStr(newMail.body + "")
Call CreateEmail(s, b)
'later you can delete these from your sent items folder
Sub CreateEmail(subject As String, body As String)
Dim olApp As Object
Dim OlMail As MailItem
Dim ToRecipient As Variant
Dim CcRecipient As Variant
Set olApp = Application
Set OlMail = olApp.CreateItem(olMailItem)
OlMail.subject = subject
OlMail.body = body
These are the reasons why I will never install a Linux on my personal Mac or PC as the main OS, at least for now.
I have to stress that these are more of a taste and the way I use my computers and might not be an issue for other people.
I also have to say that I work with linux servers in my day to day work and love them but in the desktop world I doubt Linux has a place yet. I even have an Ubuntu desktop on another computer at work that I use for some tasks.
As long as there are articles in the Linux world starting with “how to install” that means things are not yet user friendly
All I need from linux is a terminal that I have in Mac or I can ssh to a remote linux machine
Linux does not have Facetime
Skype is dodgy in linux. You will never know whether your audio card will work in the next release of linux or not!
Many apps do not have proper/strong counterparts in linux or if they have it is dodgy or buggy: Libre Office crap; different messengers all buggy, either video or audio not working properly; graphics editors, nothing close to photoshop; sound editors, don’t even think about it; Evolution/Thunderbird vs Outlook haha…
You always have to look for the drivers. Whether my webcam, printer, this and that work in linux or not.
For simple tasks you have to waste your whole day on Internet searching and finally someone suggested on their weblog that you have to put a flag on a config file for that thing to work!!
I didn’t mean to hurt anyones feelings, just for a bit of laugh 😉